Close Menu
AGC NewsAGC News
  • Home
  • News
    • Advocacy
    • Economics
    • Energy & Environment
    • Infrastructure
    • Building
    • Procurement
    • Labor & HR
    • Safety & Health
    • Technology
    • Workforce Development
  • AGC Videos
  • Constructor Magazine
    • Digital Publications
    • Online Exclusives
    • Sponsored Content
  • ConstructorCast
  • News Releases
Latest News

AGC Tech Conference: Measuring A.I.’s Impact

May 30, 2025

Trump Administration Pauses Enforcement on Portions of the Mental Health Parity Rules

May 29, 2025

AGC Supports the Rollback of Beneficial Reporting Requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act; Urges President Trump to go further.

May 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
AGC NewsAGC News
  • Home
  • News
    • Advocacy
    • Economics
    • Energy & Environment
    • Infrastructure
    • Building
    • Procurement
    • Labor & HR
    • Safety & Health
    • Technology
    • Workforce Development
  • AGC Videos
  • Constructor Magazine
    • Digital Publications
    • Online Exclusives
    • Sponsored Content
  • ConstructorCast
  • News Releases
AGC NEWSLETTERS
AGC NewsAGC News
Home » Construction Management At-Risk Use Expands at the Expense of Design-Build
Construction Law

Construction Management At-Risk Use Expands at the Expense of Design-Build

May 11, 2022Updated:December 7, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
excavator in construction site on sunset sky background
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

In construction, alternative project delivery methods typically refer to design-build, construction management at-risk (CM@R or CMAR), and integrated project delivery (IPD). Design-build and CM@R have been commonly used for so long that it seems strange to call them “alternatives.” IPD and design-build are more written about as a subject matter.  However, CM@R is just as popular as ever, and some practitioners see CM@R as the project delivery method that delivers project schedule towards completion the fastest.  Experienced practitioners of CM@R like the ability to commence construction before all the design details for the entire project are determined.  In Iowa, both chambers of the legislative body recently approved legislation, Senate Bill 183, that expands the authorization to use CM@R on public projects and explicitly disallows design-build for public projects. This would make Iowa one of two states banning design-build for all public projects joining North Dakota.

Senate Bill 183 was actively supported by the Iowa Associated General Contractors and the Master Builders of Iowa. Chad Kleppe, President & CEO of MBI, offered these comments: “This has been a long-time coming for MBI and the building industry in Iowa.  We have tried different iterations of alternative project delivery by legislation for many years.  This time, MBI, other construction associations, design professionals including the architects and engineers, and many public owner groups supported [the bill] Senate File 183.  Our members are pleased that with this recent change, once signed into law, all public owners will have a choice when building their buildings.  They can utilize the traditional design-bid-build method or, for those owners with more sophisticated projects and schedules, enter into a construction manager at-risk delivery with a guaranteed maximum price contract.  We believe these deliveries will benefit the building industry at large and the public clients we build for.”

ConsensusDocs offers comprehensive standard contract documents including the CMAR 500 series documents.  Significantly, the ConsensusDocs 500 is a standard CM@R contract that integrates the general conditions into the CM@R agreement.  Payment to the builder is on a cost of the work basis with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP). Preconstruction services are included in the work scope.  Typically, at approximately 30 percent of design development (and significantly after contract signing), the Owner and Construction Manager (CM) set the GMP. Contractually this is done by the ConsensusDocs 500.1. Standard contract documents that support contract administration, such as a certificate of substantial completion, in the 200-series of documents for traditional contracting, are also well suited for CM@R projects. 

One of the most attractive benefits offered by CM@R is that it facilitates a General Contractor’s earlier involvement and the trades. In addition, procurement selection may factor in qualifications in a best-value or qualifications-based selection process.  This means that the CM and trades may be selected by a combination of qualifications and price called best value, instead of price considerations alone which are commonly used in design-bid-build.

Using CM@R opens the possibility of using other innovative contract provisions and addendums. For instance, the ConsensusDocs 541 Design-Assist and the ConsensusDocs 305 Lean Addendum. These “lean-lite” or transitional documents have been written with the CM@R project delivery method in mind as the primary use case scenario.  Because the builders are involved earlier, BIM and value engineering are more commonly used and executed more efficiently under a CM@R than design-bid-build.

Additional Resources

AGC’s Project Delivery page on CM At-Risk: https://www.agc.org/cm-risk.

Building Federal/Heavy Highway Infrastructure Utility
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Related News

AGC Supports the Rollback of Beneficial Reporting Requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act; Urges President Trump to go further.

May 29, 2025

SCOTUS Narrows the Scope of Environmental Review

May 29, 2025

Construction Jobs Increase In 184 Metro Areas Between April 2024 And April 2025

May 28, 2025

DOD and GSA Must Follow PLA Mandate for Now, Court Rules

May 27, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest News

AGC Tech Conference: Measuring A.I.’s Impact

May 30, 2025

Trump Administration Pauses Enforcement on Portions of the Mental Health Parity Rules

May 29, 2025

AGC Supports the Rollback of Beneficial Reporting Requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act; Urges President Trump to go further.

May 29, 2025

Your source for AGC news. Find us on social media to learn more about the Associated General Contractors of America.

Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
© 2025 Associated General Contractors of America.
  • Home
  • AGC.org
  • Get In Touch
  • Convention
  • Notice of Permission to Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Antitrust Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.