Close Menu
AGC NewsAGC News
  • Home
  • News
    • Advocacy
    • Economics
    • Energy & Environment
    • Infrastructure
    • Building
    • Procurement
    • Labor & HR
    • Safety & Health
    • Technology
    • Workforce Development
  • AGC Videos
  • Constructor Magazine
    • Digital Publications
    • Online Exclusives
    • Sponsored Content
  • ConstructorCast
  • News Releases
Latest News

Trump Administration Pauses Enforcement on Portions of the Mental Health Parity Rules

May 29, 2025

AGC Supports the Rollback of Beneficial Reporting Requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act; Urges President Trump to go further.

May 29, 2025

SCOTUS Narrows the Scope of Environmental Review

May 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
AGC NewsAGC News
  • Home
  • News
    • Advocacy
    • Economics
    • Energy & Environment
    • Infrastructure
    • Building
    • Procurement
    • Labor & HR
    • Safety & Health
    • Technology
    • Workforce Development
  • AGC Videos
  • Constructor Magazine
    • Digital Publications
    • Online Exclusives
    • Sponsored Content
  • ConstructorCast
  • News Releases
AGC NEWSLETTERS
AGC NewsAGC News
Home » Rescission of Increased Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors Triggers Wage & Pricing Issues
Labor & HR

Rescission of Increased Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors Triggers Wage & Pricing Issues

March 21, 2025Updated:March 21, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
White house
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

On March 14, Pres. Trump revoked Executive Order 14026, Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors (EO). Government contractors in the service and construction sectors should evaluate how Pres. Trump’s decision to cancel the EO will impact their pricing strategies and outstanding price adjustment requests.

Effective immediately, contractors are no longer bound by EO 14026’s minimum wage requirements. This means that most service and construction contractors may revert employee pay to the applicable wage determination rates under their contracts. EO 14026, which until March 14 applied to contracts covered by the Service Contract Act and the Davis-Bacon Act, raised minimum wages for government contractors each year by the consumer price index. Most recently, on January 1, the EO increased the hourly wage rate to $17.75. Assuming certain criteria were met, contractors were also entitled to recoup the cost of the increased wages and associated labor costs by submitting a price adjustment request to the government.

Of important note, Pres. Trump’s EO does not revoke EO 13658 (also titled Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors), which was issued by Pres. Obama and imposes a lower minimum wage requirement. That minimum wage is currently $13.30. EO 14026 was intended to, over time, replace EO 13658 in new solicitations and an extension of an option; however, some contractors are still bound by EO 13658 requirements. Federal contractors should closely inspect their contracts to evaluate whether EO 14026 or EO 13658 applies.

As discussed here, there was speculation that the Trump administration would take this step. EO 14026 has been the subject of several court challenges, including decisions before the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, leading to further questions about whether it would survive.

Trump’s EO raises a number of questions about how agencies will treat outstanding price adjustment requests. Contractors once subject to EO 14026 now face a choice:  (1) continue to pay employees the heightened rate, or (2) revert to the wage determination rate. Contractors should be evaluating what is in their contracts, where they are in the price adjustment process, and whether to maintain the minimum wage in light of their ability to receive or maintain a price adjustment.

We are closely monitoring these issues and will update contractors as we learn more. If you have questions about how Pres. Trump’s recent revocation impacts your contract, contact your attorney or the authors of this article.  

Editor’s Note: This article was written by Sarah Nash and Nichole Atallah, partners in the law firm Piliero Mazza PLLC, and is reprinted with permission. The article should not be relied upon as legal advice.

Federal/Heavy Labor & HR Prevailing Wages Procurement Wages
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Related News

AGC Supports the Rollback of Beneficial Reporting Requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act; Urges President Trump to go further.

May 29, 2025

SCOTUS Narrows the Scope of Environmental Review

May 29, 2025

Construction Jobs Increase In 184 Metro Areas Between April 2024 And April 2025

May 28, 2025

DOD and GSA Must Follow PLA Mandate for Now, Court Rules

May 27, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Trump Administration Pauses Enforcement on Portions of the Mental Health Parity Rules

May 29, 2025

AGC Supports the Rollback of Beneficial Reporting Requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act; Urges President Trump to go further.

May 29, 2025

SCOTUS Narrows the Scope of Environmental Review

May 29, 2025

Your source for AGC news. Find us on social media to learn more about the Associated General Contractors of America.

Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
© 2025 Associated General Contractors of America.
  • Home
  • AGC.org
  • Get In Touch
  • Convention
  • Notice of Permission to Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Antitrust Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.